Thursday, 2 June 2011

Till Death Us Do Part?

I was asked a question about life-long relationships today: “do you think that beings in 5th/6th dimensional worlds mate for life?”  I am perplexed by the way humans can so easily betray their mates and I’ve never understood the notion that one can “fall out of love”.  How is that even possible?  I still love every ex of mine and the idea that someone would leave their wife when she has young children with no way of supporting herself is abusive to my mind. These things do not register for me. I wonder if it’s because this is how people live in the higher realms? How do you feel about this topic?

My reply reads:

I have opinions and thoughts but they are not much help so I am going to write whatever words come to me from my heart on this and shut out the prejudice of whatever I think in my head. So here goes:

"The answer to this question lies in the difference between true love and romantic love. First one must understand that there is a discrepancy between what people think is love and the reality of it. Love is unconditional and that remains true everywhere, on planet earth and beyond into the stars. Therefore, nothing else prevails anywhere in reality.
That said, there is a vast difference between cultures across the stars but at their core is the same love.

Now let's look at the issue a little closer: we have to take on board that in the current perceived reality on earth there are millions of beings brainwashed by society into believing that love is somehow the expression of sexual attraction. It is not. Love has nothing to do with attraction which is itself derived from perceived need for growth. When we encounter a being whom we are drawn to, we see something they have to offer us and it is this that sets the tone for the relationship as long as it persists. Once the perceived benefit is ended, so is the relationship, though many hang on in the hope that it can somehow be revived. This is, however, forlorn, since to revive the dead is not possible.

So, when we consider this question in full in its proper context, one will see that there is a vast difference between sexual attraction and love. Love is the natural state amongst all beings in an enlightened society of 5th dimensional level. It is experienced independently of sexual attraction and for all beings. Therefore, the notion of enduring relationships is false. They may endure for a purpose or role to be complete but there is no need for attachment to that relationship once the role is over. The love continues naturally as it is there for all beings. There is no disharmony involved, just the recognition that it is complete in order to allow the parties involved to move on. This appraisal may seem cold in the context of current societal beliefs but in reality it is the utmost expression of a loving society designed to perpetuate itself and grow.

For example, there is a society of exceptional standards of love and being where the people are advanced beings at a whole level beyond humanity on earth. In this society, people are all 5th dimensional beings and very alert to the realities of love and notions of attraction. They know that love stems from their very being naturally and without effort and that attraction is simply the way we are drawn to those they need for their growth. As a result, they choose wisely and only mate with those whom they have vetted carefully beforehand to ensure they meet their needs. When they do so, they are bonded for life by their choice but are free to express their feelings elsewhere whenever they like. There is no jealousy involved because love transcends sexuality and sexual encounters. The norm is to remain with one partner and seek outside what may be missing energetically between them. No one person fulfils all needs. However, sexual encounters differ from earth in that they are less about physical contact and more about energy exchange. There is no ejaculation as such, just a surge of energy at a key point. So it is that the whole concept of sex is less "sleazy" (messy) than on earth! It should be understood therefore that the exchange is entirely more sophisticated than on earth and not base in the way human exchanges can be. People have evolved beyond that stage.”

The effect of the exchange on me was to leave me intrigued! I was not surprised by much of it because of a piece that I channelled 3 years ago in the midst of my own journey of sexual freedom as an access to eventual spiritual freedom. I am, however, still the product of a society where we often regard sex as “bad” and sex outside a relationship as a betrayal unless with mutual consent of all concerned. I have always sought monogamous relationships and wanted someone for life. Though I loved my 6-month period of freedom in 2008 and none of my encounters was anything less than loving at one level, I am more suited to sharing my life with one special person. Yet, I have met people that I would wish to "exchange energies with" were I not in a relationship and I feel that it would in no way alter how I feel about my partner, but I am with someone who is not in that space and I love, honour and respect him very much and do not wish to hurt him. I admit that I am still so wedded to current expectations that the idea of him "playing around" doesn't appeal to me though something perhaps with us both present (does that sound kinky?) is appealing but not on the cards for the foreseeable future! But due to how I have felt, what this says does resonate with me despite my own 3rd dimensional attachments. I think the point is that the whole picture changes when we are in a 5th dimensional plane of existence since the petty jealousies, etc, simply vanish and we are loving with all beings.

Anyway, I felt a tad shaken by the above, as it shakes the foundations of my beliefs and feelings which have changed 180 degrees since I began this spiritual journey and here I don't mean the sexual part of it. If you knew me 25 years ago you would laugh to hear me says this as in those days I saw even thinking about someone else as being "adultery of the mind", no kidding (such was my self repression and intolerance)!

If what I have produced here (which occurs as more like channelling given the 1st person addressing of me as in the 2nd person) is correct, it is highly controversial and yet also very consistent with what we know about love. It is attachments to the 3rd dimension that make it a little hard for me to accept but I am almost there with it. How do you feel - disappointed, upset, or intrigued? I think I am largely in the latter space with minor doses of the former two!

No comments:

Post a Comment